Sui Juris and Sui Generis
su·i ju·ris ˌso͞oˌī ˈjo͝oris, adjective LAW of age; independent legal person. “the beneficiaries are all sui juris” Sui Juris Court Angels One who has all the rights to which a freemen is entitled; one who is not under the power of another, as a slave, a minor, and the like.
2. To make a valid contract, a person must, in general, be sui juris. Every one of full age is presumed to be sui juris.
Greetings. I want to talk with you about a widely misunderstood word: Sui Juris that makes us all Sui Generis, maeaning, [Latin, Of its own kind or class.] That which is the only one of its kind. Though individuality we all qualify to this definition but more over, noun in its own category, in its own group, of its own character, of its own class, of its own classification, of its own denomination, of its own designation, of its own genre, of its own kind, of its own nature, of its own type, of its own variety, peculiar, special, the only one of its kind, unique!
Sui Juris, The Latin text reads: “Rara est Reginarum Matrum usque ad tutelae finem perdurans, nec ullis simultatum nebulis turbata potentia: rarior post depositam administrationem modestia: quam retinere satius esset, quam prorogato in annos, quibus sui juris filius est, imperio offensas accersere. The text reads: “It is rare for the protection of the Queen Mother until the end of the exercise, nor any feelings stirred up clouds of potentially thinner after abandoning self-administration, rather than keep it was better than that extended for years in its own right son, the government clinging to call.” and what it’s intent and original meaning make up what it means in our world today!
Who and what is meant by “Queen Mother” in all this one might ask… The Queen of England? The self proclaimed Leader of the Muslim Faith? The Three Inns and What is The Middle Inn? What is The BAR Council of England and Wales? BAR ASSOCIATIONS and PATENTS hidden in plain site to control every aspect of our living Rights with control after Death?
A judicial tribunal established to administer justice. An entity in the government to which the administration of justice is delegated. In a broader sense, the term may also refer to a legislative assembly; a deliberative body, such as the General Court of Massachusetts, which is its legislature. The words court, judge, or judges, when used in laws, are often synonymous. A kangaroo court is a mock legal proceeding that disregards law and justice by issuing a biased, predetermined judgment regardless of the evidence presented before it.
Judicial courts are created by the government through the enactment of statutes or by constitutional provisions for the purpose of enforcing the law for the public good. They are impartial forums for the resolution of controversies between parties who seek redress from a violation of a legal right. Both civil and criminal matters may be heard in the same court, with different court rules and procedures for each.
The public has a right to attend judicial proceedings. This right ensures that the proceedings will be conducted in a fair and unbiased manner. Anyone who wants may attend trials as a spectator unless a judge has closed a courtroom for particular proceedings in order to maintain order, to assure Due Process of Law, or to protect a witness’s identity.
The U.S. Judicial System consists of 52 separate court systems, plus territorial courts, in the United States. Each state and the District of Columbia has its own independent system, and the United States government maintains federal courts throughout the country. The federal courts and state courts are independent of each other. The federal courts are authorized by Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution to hear controversies that especially affect federal interests. Sometimes the existence of two parallel court systems in every state creates a strain and raises important issues concerning Federalism, the relationship between the states and the United States. For some of these questions, the Supreme Court of the United States makes the final determination that is binding on everyone.
Most courts have a multilevel structure. A few states have a two-tiered system, but the federal government and most states use a three-tiered model. All litigants have an opportunity to argue their cases before a trial-level court, and subsequently they may be able to pursue the matter further up through two levels of appeals courts.
In the federal court system the trial-level court is the district court. Each state contains at least one district court, and most of these courts have more than one judge available to try cases. Litigants may file an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals that has jurisdiction over that district if they are unhappy with the lower court’s decision, and the decision is the type that may be appealed. The United States is divided into 13 judicial circuits, and one court of appeals sits in each of twelve geographical circuits. The Court of Appeals for the Federal District sits in the thirteenth district to hear cases formerly entertained in the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patents Appeals, which were abolished by the enactment of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982 (28 U.S.C.A. § 1 note). Each court of appeals has four or more judges who sit either as panels of three or as a whole to review the decisions of district courts and to review or enforce the orders of many federal. administrative agencies. If a court sits as a whole, it is called an en banc court. Litigants who lose a cause in a court of appeals may be able to carry the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
[Latin, French. In the bench.] Full bench. Refers to a session where the entire membership of the court will participate in the decision rather than the regular quorum. In other countries, it is common for a court to have more members than are usually necessary to hear an appeal. In the United States, the Circuit Courts of Appeal usually sit in panels of judges but for important cases may expand the bench to a larger number, when the judges are said to be sitting en banc. Similarly, only one of the judges of the u.s. tax court will typically hear and decide on a tax controversy. However, when the issues involved are unusually novel or of wide impact, the case will be heard and decided by the full court sitting en banc.
Sui Juris Court Angels
Depending on who you ask, social media in the courtroom may not be much of an issue. The Federal Judicial Center surveyed 494 judges in 2014 and found that only 33 of them had encountered problems with the likes of Facebook and Twitter, and these incidents occurred predominantly during trials. Some cases have gained national notoriety, however, shining a spotlight on the effect of online networking in courtrooms.
Our Policy is to become an conduit for Live Borne and be a buffer towards contracting openly with free will and consent Vs. Corporate Oligarchic Agency Over site!(Law)(Court)(Lawyer)(Attorney)(Court Advocate)(Investigation)(Court Reporter)(Notary)(Judge)(Clerk)(Jury)(Support)(Laymen)(Rights)(Due Process)(Equal Protection)(Legal Assistant) become our place to insure no contempt by those we put in power to oversee our disputes for proper Remedies to Relief!Did you know however that the current system is under The BAR Council and wholly controlled by a very secret few some call the elites? In the United States, there are specific elements of a crime that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in order to obtain a conviction. The three specific elements (with exception) that define a crime which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in order to obtain a conviction: (1) that a crime has actually occurred (actus reus), (2) that the accused intended the crime to happen (mens rea) and (3) and concurrence of the two meaning there is a timely relationship between the first two factors. Without these we all have a right to be left alone!
Understanding Actus Reus
Criminal act, or actus reus, is generally defined as a criminal act that was the result of voluntary bodily movement. A criminal act can also occur when a defendant fails to act (also known as omission). A criminal act must occur because people cannot be legally punished because of their thoughts or intentions. Also, referencing the Eighth Amendment Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment, crimes cannot be defined by status.
What is a patent? Answer: It is a property right for an invention granted by a government to the inventor. A United States patent gives inventors the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale it’s invention in the United States. So how does a foreign BAR Council have the right to control every aspect of our American life via our Judicatory processes? would come to mind; after all aren’t we Americans? BAR PATENT?
A patent may be obtained for any new, useful, unobvious invention, though it generally cannot be obtained for the laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas; a new mineral or a new plant found in the wild; inventions useful solely in the utilization of special nuclear material or atomic energy for weapons; a machine that is not useful; printed matter; or human beings.
There are specific requirements for all patent applications. An application must include a specification, including a description and claim(s); an oath or declaration identifying the applicant(s) believing to be the original inventor(s); a drawing when necessary; and the filing fee. Prior to 1870, a model of the invention was required as well, but today, a model is almost never required.
Naming an invention—another requirement of submitting a patent—actually involves developing at least two names: the generic name and the brand name or trademark. For example, Pepsi® and Coke® are brand names; cola or soda is the generic or product name. Big Mac® and Whopper® are brand names; hamburger is the generic or product name. Nike® and Reebok® are brand names; sneaker or athletic shoe are generic or product names… Do you wonder why two names identify you in legal forms; Kevin Francis Ramey or KEVIN FRANCIS RAMEY; could you be a patent of an others design, such as a BAR PATENT contracting your energy to the State/STATE? Starting to connect the dots? Well then who invented and claim ownership by patent your Intellectual Property given to you when you were live borne and recorded, the name given to you by your natural Father and Mother?
The ABA-IPL Section has formed a new Task Force to address issue in the STRONGER Patents Act of 2017, recently introduced in the U.S. Senate. The bill includes many of the provisions found in the STRONG Act, and several new provisions, all intended to restore confidence in issued patents by, among other things, limiting abuses and inequities found in existing PTAB proceedings. The Section’s Task Force will be chaired by Donna Meuth, current Vice-Chair of the Patents Division.
The Section has also formed a Task Force to determine what the Section’s policy should be on the constitutionality of the IPR provisions in the America Invents Act of 2011. The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted cert in the Oil States Energy Services case on this issue. The question presented before the Court concerns whether only federal courts can decide if an issued patent is valid. That question has been presented in part as a dispute over whether a patent grant is a private right or a public right. The Task Force will be co-chaired by Todd Walters, current chair of the section’s USPTO Operations Relating to Patents (Ex Parte Practice) Committee, and Paul Morico, current Special Advisor to the Patents Division. This can all be found by researching and you can learn much over the years researching. Bottom line, the BAR has a patent on practice of law which bars the laymen from practice unless you are a member of a BAR ASSOCIATION… are you beginning to see and hear the magnitude of my observations? From here on I’ll periodically up my thoughts and opinions; should you consider my position in error? Search for your own knowledge…Birdman^j^